British attitude to war 'hardens'The
International Committee for the Red Cross conducted a survey in 1998 found that 72% of people in Britain felt that civilians should be protected in wartime. This year, that figure had fallen to only 51%.
Almost half the population of Britain feels that it is acceptable to target the civilian population of a country during armed conflict, something that flies in the face of the customary laws of war, basic standards of humanity and decency, and the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
It is a retrograde step, harkening back to the tactic of reprisals in armed conflict.
The ICRC has put a brave face on this depressing statistic, pointing out that on deeper questioning regarding specific tactics (kidnapping civilians, use of torture etc), then the percentage of people who viewed this as impermissible remained consistently high.
But there is one further depressing statistic, and one that this government in general, and Tony Blair's government in particular, is responsible for. In almost all age categories, over 90% of the population were aware of the Geneva Conventions. Almost all. Except for those 18-24. In that age group, awareness drops to 61%.
Let us ignore the fact that as a signatory to the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949, the United Kingdom is under an obligation to disseminate the texts of the Conventions and ensure that the entire population the population are aware of the principles, rights, duties and obligations incumbent under the Conventions and the Additional Protocols (Art 47
GC I, Art 48
GC II, Art 127
GC III, Art 144
GC IV). Let us ignore the fact that manifestly the present Labour government has failed to discharge this duty, as a generation of people educated under this government are growing up ignorant of the Geneva Conventions.
Ignore the failure to discharge this obligation. That is not the problem, merely a symptom of a greater problem. The wholesale disrespect/disdain/disregard that the British government under Tony Blair had for the principles of international law, international humanitarian law and the entire post-1945 international legal and diplomatic system. Whereas before we were guided by fairness, justice, law and humanity, now sending in the army is seen as acceptable, rather than the method of last resort.
This not only shows disrespect for an international system based on the principles of peaceful coexistence and non-interference, but it shows disrespect to the military covenant. Far from only engaging our armed forces when absolutely necessary, we engage them on the whim of a Prime Minister hungry for his place in history. And when they come back, we abandon and forget them.
This disdain has rubbed off on the generation growing up under Blair. Will the next generation of leaders show a similar brutal disregard for the very principles that their grandparents fought for, died for, and for some were the very principles that kept them alive?
All leaders seek a legacy. Gordon Brown's legacy should be to renew this country's commitment to peace, justice and the law. Otherwise we will reap the whirlwind of Blair's legacy of disdain.